Which is better: save tax by investing 50,000 in NPS or 35,000 in equity mutual fund?
11 Sep 2022 - Contact Sayan Sircar
7 mins read
This article shows you if it is better to take advantage of Section 80CCD to save up to 15,000 tax by investing in NPS Tier 1.
Table of Contents
- How can you save tax with NPS?
- Asset allocation in NPS
- Assumptions being made to compare NPS with MF
- NPS vs Equity MF comparison
- What happens after 60?
How can you save tax with NPS?
National Pension Scheme (NPS) is a defined contribution retirement plan launched in May 2009 with the following features:
- withdrawable only at 60 years of age, of which
- 60% can be withdrawn as a lump sum tax-free
- the remaining 40% is compulsorily invested in an annuity to provide a lifelong pension
NPS contributions are tax-deductible under 80C. There is an additional deduction under section 80CCD for 50,000 i.e. tax payable reduces by 30% (slab rate) times ₹50,000 or ₹ 15,000 per year under Section 80CCD(1B). There is even more tax deduction available if your company has corporate NPS as well.
This ₹ 15,000 tax benefit is the largest and only carrot that incentivises investment in NPS. We have argued before that investors should avoid NPS investment beyond the ₹50,000/year needed to save tax: Is NPS the right option for your retirement planning?.
In this article, we will talk about where it is worth investing ₹50,000 in NPS vs. paying the tax and investing in mutual funds. The other two options are not considered since:
- it is very easy to maximise 80C even without NPS
- the corporate deduction is not available to everyone
Asset allocation in NPS
The investment options in NPS are governed by the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) rules. NPS funds are essentially mutual funds with the following four asset classes described below:
Equity option (Scheme E)
This class invests in stocks like other equity mutual funds, and risks/returns are in line with other equity mutual funds. Large fluctuations in equity funds are considered normal, say 40% or worse falls in a year or 60%+ rise in other years. Unless they have entered the stock market since the post-Mar 2020 bull run, investors are well aware of the nature of this fluctuation.
Government bond option (Scheme G)
This class invests primarily in RBI, i.e. Government bonds. These bonds have a sovereign guarantee, i.e. no risk of default. However, based on the time to maturity of each bond in the portfolio, they have interest or duration risk. We extensively cover the concept of duration risk here: Should you match debt portfolio duration with goal duration?, but the summary is that the Scheme G NAV will fluctuate considerably due to interest rate changes in the economy.
This fact may surprise investors new to the concept of duration risk or who have only seen high returns from this category due to falling interest rates in line with global economic trends.
Corporate bond option (Scheme C)
This class invests in corporate bonds, i.e. debt issued by companies, not the Central/State Governments. Apart from duration risk, this category has credit risk also since there is always the risk that the company that has issued the bond can fail to pay back interest and principal.
Alternative Investments option (Scheme A)
This class invests in alternative investments in products like Alternative Investment Funds (AIF), Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS), REITs, InvIts, and other similar investments. Due to their nature, these products are high-risk investments and have existed since 2016 in NPS. Therefore, we are excluding their discussion in this article. Since the allowed allocation to this category is capped at 5% of the corpus, it does not make a material difference to the returns of the NPS portfolio.
We have argued before that investors should use the Active choice option with the same equity to debt asset allocation as their retirement corpus held outside NPS.
Active choice gives a lot of flexibility to the investor with the maximum equity allocation capped as per the image above: up to 75% until the age of 50 and then reducing by 2.5% a year to 50% at 60.
Assumptions being made to compare NPS with MF
In this comparison, we will assume the current tax benefit of NPS continues and therefore
- the tax bracket of the investor is 30%
- ₹50,000/year is invested in NPS (Tier 1 account) via the active-choice mode (75% equity up to age 50, 2.5% reduction in equity every year, the rest in government bonds)
- ₹35,000/year is invested in an equity mutual fund
- Equity returns are 11% post-tax on average and debt returns are 6% post-tax on average
- We will assume linear returns for both equity and debt to keep the calculation simple. We acknowledge that a better alternative will be to perform a MonteCarlo simulation with historical risk/return data which we will cover in a future article
Our new Goal-based investing tool will help you to create and manage all of your goals in one place. Click the image below to get access:
Arthgyaan creates a system for reaching your financial goals by sharing simple, actionable advice backed by research and analysis.
NPS vs Equity MF comparison
The chart shows that the further the retirement age of 60, the more the chance that your equity mutual fund investment overtakes the amount in NPS. Investors can use this chart like this:
- take your age and subtract it from 60. Say it is 25
- find 25 on the x-axis in the chart
- locate the corpus numbers for both NPS and MF in the chart on the y-axis
- invest in the option which has the higher corpus after 25 years. In this case, it is equity MF
At this point, investors should understand that in the bigger scheme of things, their retirement corpus goes into crores: How much corpus is needed to spend 1 lakh per month in retirement?. Saving 15,000 tax sounds significant in the beginning of the career when income is lower but becomes insignificant very soon given the unfortunate risks in NPS beyond the forced annuity clause and lock-in until 60. It will be simpler to avoid investing in NPS completely to preserve liquidity of the corpus both before and after retirement.
What happens after 60?
An interesting comparison can happen when the NPS corpus becomes eligible for withdrawal at 60%. Since 40% of the corpus needs to be invested in an annuity. Given that annuity returns are both fixed (i.e. does not increase with inflation) and taxable, we will be forced to endure poor post retirement returns vs. a diversified and liquid portfolio of equity and debt mutual funds. We will cover this topic in detail in a future article.If you liked this article, consider subscribing to new posts by email by filling the form below.
Worked out case studies for goal-based investing
Case study: how this double income recently married family can perform DIY goal-based investment planning
This article shows how a young just-married couple can invest for future goals using the Arthgyaan goal-based investing tool.
Did you welcome a bundle of joy in your 40s? This article will discuss ways of planning the child’s (and your’s financial future)
This article shows how a very typical salaried couple with one child can invest for future goals using the Arthgyaan goal-based investing tool.
Previous and next articles:
This article offers the steps for identifying, quantifying and investing for buying your dream house.
Published: 7 September 2022
8 MIN READ
This article shows you a simple set of rules for planning any financial goal: from a month to decades away via three buckets of assets.
Published: 14 September 2022
6 MIN READ
We discuss if it is a good idea for conservative NRI investors to create a retirement portfolio in India only with safe and risk-free investment options.
Published: 25 September 2022
8 MIN READ
This article settles the question of which type of capital gain calculation is better - debt-type funds taxed at 20% with indexation vs equity-type at 10%.
Published: 21 September 2022
5 MIN READ
Topics you will like:Asset Allocation (17) Basics (7) Behaviour (10) Budgeting (9) Calculator (11) Case Study (3) Children (7) Choosing Investments (24) FAQ (2) FIRE (9) Gold (6) Health Insurance (4) House Purchase (13) Insurance (11) International Investing (8) Life Stages (2) Loans (10) NPS (5) NRI (4) News (5) Portfolio Construction (34) Portfolio Review (20) Retirement (26) Review (7) Risk (6) Safe Withdrawal Rate (3) Set Goals (25) Step by step (6) Tax (15)
1. Email me with any questions.2. Use our goal-based investing template to prepare a financial plan for yourself
use this quick and fast online calculator to find out the SIP amount and asset allocation for your goals.
Disclaimer: Content on this site is for educational purpose only and is not financial advice. Nothing on this site should be construed as an offer or recommendation to buy/sell any financial product or service. Please consult a registered investment advisor before making any investments.
This post titled Which is better: save tax by investing 50,000 in NPS or 35,000 in equity mutual fund? first appeared on 11 Sep 2022 at https://arthgyaan.com
We are currently at 186 posts and growing fast. Search this site: Copyright © 2021-2022 Arthgyaan.com. All rights reserved.